Theoretical innovations in international relations from the perspective of “Global South”

Hao Cui

doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6468

Home - JIPD - Volume 8 - Issue 8

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

Theoretical innovations in international relations from the perspective of “Global South”

Hao Cui

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2024, 8(8), 6468; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6468

Submitted：17 May 2024

Accepted：06 Jun 2024

Published：23 Aug 2024

Download PDF(320.45KB)

Cite

XML

Abstract

“Global South” is undoubtedly a broad term that typically refers to developing countries with varying degrees of economic, cultural and political influence. The rise of the Global South signifies the importance of reassessing the existing international order. In terms of international relations theory, this should be an innovative, progressive and reflective field of study. However, this research is predominantly led by the Western mainstream international relations theories. This often neglects the internal and external factors in the development processes of other countries, the formation of relationship frameworks, foreign policy formulation, and the need of foreign relations. Despite the ongoing and intense debate over the innovation of international relations theory, it is difficult to see it keeping pace with contemporary developments. Various schools and thoughts frequently innovate only within their foundational frameworks. Therefore, for Global South countries, there is the need for international relations theories that can reflect their specific needs and actual conditions. This does not only require breaking away from the westcentric theoretical framework, but ensuring that the innovation process is aligned with practical realities that recognize mutual interests and encompass both local and global perspectives. This approach should involve a comprehensive reflection on international relations, allowing innovation of international relations theories to genuinely “enter” the Global South countries.

Keywords

References

Acharya, A. (2000). Ethnocentrism and Emancipatory IR Theory. In: Arnold, S., & Bier, J. M. (editors). (Dis)placing Security: Critical Re-evaluations of the Boundaries of Security Studies. Toronto: York University, Centre for International and Strategic Studies. pp. 1–18.

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm012

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2009). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. In: Non-Western international relations theory. Routledge. pp. 11–35.

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. Oxon: Routledge.

Barkin, J. S., & Cronin, B. (1994). The state and the nation: changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in international relations. International Organization, 48(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300000837

Barnett, M., & Zarakol, A. (2023). Global international relations and the essentialism trap. International Theory, 15(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971923000131

Berenskoetter, F. (2010). Identity in international relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.

Biersteker, T. J. (2009). Global governance. In: The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies. Routledge. pp. 455–467.

Buzan, B. (2009). Non-Western international relations theory. Routledge. pp. 11–35.

Buzan, B. (2016). Could IR Be Different? International Studies Review, 18(1), 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv025

Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2000). International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford University Press.

Capasso, M. (2023). IR, Imperialism, and the Global South: From Libya to Venezuela. Politics, 43(4), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211061232

Chatterjee, A. (2012). Theorizing the Global South in IR: Problems and Prospects. In: Proceedings of the First Global South International Studies Conference; Menton, France.

Chaturvedi, S. (2016). The development compact: A theoretical construct for South-South cooperation. International Studies, 53(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881717705927

Connell, R. (2020). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Routledge.

Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Millennium, 12(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701

Devetak, R. (1996). Postmodernism, Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 179–209.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.

Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise: The Latin American Modernity/Coloniality Research Program. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3): 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162506

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds, Duke. University Press.

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press.

Ethier, W. J. (1998). The new regionalism. The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00335

Fearon, J. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195–222.

Gray, K., & Gills, B. K. (2016). South-South cooperation and the rise of the Global South. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1128817

Hewson, M., Sinclair, T. J., & Sinclair, T. (1999). Approaches to global governance theory. Suny Press.

Hobson, J. M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hobson, J. M. (2007). Is critical theory always for the white West and for Western imperialism? Beyond Westphilian towards a post-racist critical IR. Review of International Studies, 33(S1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210507007413

Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton. NJ, Princeton University Press.

Jackson, R., & Sørensen, G. (2013). Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 5th ed. Oxford University Press.

Kayaoglu, T. (2010). Westphalian Eurocentrism in international relations theory. International Studies Review, 12(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00928.x

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.

Kiros, T. (2019). Self Definition: A Philosophical Inquiry from the Global South and Global North. Lexington Books.

Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Lemke, T., Szarejko, A. A., Auchter, J., et al. (2023). doing historical international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 36(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2044754

Linklater, A. (1996). Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State. European Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066196002001003

Lyotard, J. F. (1979). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University Of Minnesota Press.

Mignolo, W. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton University Press.

Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-Coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647

Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.

Milner, H. (1991). The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: a critique. Review of International Studies, 17(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026021050011232x

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Nkiwane, T. C. (2001). Africa and International Relations: Regional Lessons for a Global Discourse. International Political Science Review, 22(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101223005

Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective Identity and Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283

Qin, Y. (2005). The Chinese Path of International Relations Theory: A Cultural Perspective. World Economy and Politics, (6), 14–22.

Rousseau, D. L. (2006). Identifying threats and threatening identities: The social construction of realism and liberalism. Stanford University Press.

Rumelili, B. (2014). West-centrism and postcolonialism. Introduction to Global Politics: Concepts (Turkish). Teoriler ve Süreçler, Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 203–220.

Tickner, A. (2003). Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(2), 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298030320020301

Tickner, J. A. (2016). Knowledge Is Power: Challenging IR’s Eurocentric Narrative. International Studies Review, 18(1), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv026

Williams, M. (1996). Rethinking Sovereignty, Globalization: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. pp. 109–122.

Yan, X. (1997). Theory of International Political Structure. World Knowledge Publishing House.

Zhang, Y. (2010). Chinese Scholars on International Relations: Rethinking Theory and Methodology. World Economic and Political Forum, (3), 10–15.

Zhang, Y. (2017). International Relations Theoretical Innovation under the Perspective of the Global South. World Economic and Political Forum, (4), 142–160.

Zhu, F. (2010). Realism and Chinese Foreign Policy. Diplomatic Review, (1), 19–34.

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue