In this paper, we begin with a review of animal and human experiments on the carcinogenicity of aspartame, and then draw out the “seemingly contradictory” conclusions of two internationally renowned organizations, in order to arrive at a unanimous conclusion on the carcinogenicity of aspartame. Secondly, with the analysis of the in vivo reaction of aspartame, we analyze the criteria of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for classifying the carcinogenicity grade of substances in order to dispel people’s meaningless fears. Thirdly, based on the discussion of the carcinogenicity of aspartame, we reflect on the current problems in higher chemistry education. Finally, we will give rational advice on how to deal with aspartame in light of the lack of empirical studies.

In this paper, we begin with a review of animal and human experiments on the carcinogenicity of aspartame, and then draw out the “seemingly contradictory” conclusions of two internationally renowned organizations, in order to arrive at a unanimous conclusion on the carcinogenicity of aspartame. Secondly, with the analysis of the in vivo reaction of aspartame, we analyze the criteria of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) for classifying the carcinogenicity grade of substances in order to dispel people’s meaningless fears. Thirdly, based on the discussion of the carcinogenicity of aspartame, we reflect on the current problems in higher chemistry education. Final_x005fly, we will give rational advice on how to deal with aspartame in light of the lack of empirical studies.