This study critically examines the multifaceted dynamics of foreign employee integration within the Czech Republic, with a specific focus on the Mladá Boleslav region. Conducted prior to the Ukrainian crisis, this research serves as a crucial baseline for understanding integration in a pre-crisis context and provides comparative insights into the evolving challenges and opportunities amid the subsequent migration movements. The study explores various aspects of integration and inclusion, drawing upon migration theories, economic factors, and sociological perspectives to understand the motivators and challenges faced by foreigners, particularly in light of the majority society’s perception, which often leans towards skepticism and negativity. The research methodology builds on grounded theory and integrates both quantitative and qualitative approaches, utilizing surveys and semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of foreign nationals, with an emphasis on immigrant women. A key finding of the study is the significant role of employers in facilitating integration. The paper discusses how businesses, through inclusive policies and practices, can profoundly influence the integration experience. Cooperation between employers, local integration centers, and other relevant organizations emerges as vital, providing additional resources and support systems to enhance the integration process. The study concludes by emphasizing the critical role of various stakeholders, particularly employers, in shaping sustainable human resources practices that foster a more inclusive and harmonious society.

The main objective of the study was to examine factors that influence employee performance in general and, more specifically, in public enterprises. The research approach was qualitative, with an in-depth literature review and content analysis. The findings of the study reflect that some factors have a positive and some have a negative influence on employee performance. The study also shows a significant relationship between factors and employee performance, which in turn has a multiplier effect on employee development. Recommendations include the need to provide resources for employee training and development, and the strategic aims and objectives of public enterprises should be aligned with the training and development programs.

Within this broader analytical framework, this paper seeks to explore the apparent impact of digital transformation on employee relations within the context of listed companies. A theoretical model is proposed, positing digital transformation as the independent variable, employee relations as the dependent variable, and what might be characterized as cultural fit as a potential moderating variable. Based on an analysis of 482 ostensibly valid questionnaires collected from a sample of 500 A-share listed companies in China, what seems to emerge from these findings is that the mean score for the digital transformation scale was approximately 3.62, which tends to point toward a stage of local optimisation. The mean scores for the employee relations and corporate cultural fit scales were found to be 3.55 and 3.58, respectively. What the evidence appears to reveal is that digital transformation seems to be substantially positively correlated with employee relations (r ≈ 0.62, p < 0.01), and corporate cultural fit appears to share a similar positive correlation with both. What the analysis tends to support, furthermore, is that digital transformation appears to have a substantial positive impact on employee relations (β ≈ 0.58, p < 0.01). What seems especially noteworthy in this analytical context is that corporate culture fit seems to lend support to what may represent a positive moderating role (β ≈ 0.21, p < 0.05). In the high-fit group, the impact of digital transformation on employee relations appears to tend to suggest it is seemingly stronger (β ≈ 0.68, p < 0.01). What appears to emerge from this evidence, therefore, is the construction of a tentative model of this three-way relationship, ostensibly providing a basis for companies to balance technological innovation and humanistic care.

Keywords: Digital transformation; listed companies; employee relations; corporate culture compatibility; moderating effects

Stress has evolutionary roots that help human beings evolve and survive. Existing workplace mental health models typically view stress as the direct cause of poor mental health. Such models focus on strategies to eliminate it. Guided by O’Connor and Kirtley’s integrated motivational-volitional (IMV) model, we posit that demanding jobs and high-stress environments do not directly impact an individual’s mental health but trigger a “sense of self” moderator (SSM), which then leads to mental health outcomes. This moderator is modified by the workplace’s organizational design and individual’s traits. We propose a Workplace Mental Health (WMH) Model, which suggests that by addressing these SSM modifiers through evidence-based interventions at organizational and individual levels, even in high-stress environments, organizations can have mentally healthy workforces and build high-performance workplaces. This paper assumes that stress is an inalienable part of any work environment and that a secular reduction in stress levels in modern society is infeasible. Although some individuals in high-stress job environments develop mental illness, many do not, and some even thrive. This differential response suggests that stress may act as a trigger, but an individual’s reaction to it is influenced more by other factors than the stress itself.