[1] Beavers, John. Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In J. Dolling and T. Hey de Zybatow (eds.) Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2008: 245–265.
[2] Bliss, Heather. Morpholexical Transparency and the Argument Structure of Verbs of Cutting and Breaking [J], Cognitive Linguistics, 2007(18-2): 153-177.
[3] Chao, Yuen Ren. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968: 69.
[4] Folli, Rafaella and Heidi Harley. Teleology and animacy in external arguments’, Lingua [J], 2008(1321): 1-14.
[5] Hawkins, R. Second Language Syntax: a generative introduction [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
[6] Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M].London:Edward Arnold,1975.
[7] Keenan, E.L.Towards a universal definition of subject . In C. N. Li(ed.)Subject and Topic . New York: Academic Press, 1976:
303-334.
[8] Levin, Beth. Semantic Roles. In M. Aronoff,(ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014:
132-151.
[9] Levin, Beth. Verb Classes Within and Across Languages. In B. Comrie and A. Malchukov. (eds.) Valency Classes: A Comparative
Handbook . Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2015: 1-37.
[10]Levin, Beth. Semantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations, Annual Review of Linguistic s 1 [J]. (URL), 2015: 1-22.
[11] Lyons, J. Semantics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[12] Quirk, R. A Grammar of Contemporary English [M]. London: Longman, 1972: 58-88.
[13] Li, C.N.& S.A.Thompson. Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In C. N. Li(ed.)Subject and Topic . New York:
Academic Press, 1976: 457-489.
[14] Pylkkanen, Liina. Introducing Arguments [M]. Cambridge, A: MIT Press, 2008.