The aid-corruption paradox in development: An examination of provinces in Indonesia

Donie Kadewandana; Ade Paranata; Viktória Endrődi-Kovács

doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5356

Home - JIPD - Volume 8 - Issue 10

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

The aid-corruption paradox in development: An examination of provinces in Indonesia

Donie Kadewandana

Ade Paranata

Viktória Endrődi-Kovács

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2024, 8(10), 5356; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5356

Submitted：21 Mar 2024

Accepted：27 Jun 2024

Published：23 Sept 2024

Download PDF(1.93M)

Cite

XML

Abstract

The relationship between aid and corruption remains ambiguous. On the one hand, aid may benefit a country if the aid management system runs efficiently and transparently. On the other hand, aid tends to create new problems, namely corruption, especially in developing countries. This research examines the aid-corruption paradox in Indonesian provinces from a spatial perspective. The data was obtained from the Indonesian Ministry of Finance, the National Development Planning Agency of Indonesia, the Corruption Eradication Commission of Indonesia, and the Electronic Procurement Service, referring to 34 Indonesian provinces between 2011 and 2019. The research applies the spatial panel method and uses Haversine distance to construct the weighted matrix. The spatial error model (SEM) is the best for Model 1 (Grants) and Model 2 (Loans) and the best corruption model in Model 3 (Gratification). The spatial autoregressive model (SAR) is the best approach for Model 4 (Public Complaints) and Model 5 (Corruption). The findings show that there is no spatial dependence between provinces in Indonesia in terms of grants or loans. However, corruption in Indonesia is widespread.

Keywords

References

Acht, M., Mahmoud, T. O., & Thiele, R. (2015). Corrupt governments do not receive more state-to-state aid: Governance and the delivery of foreign aid through non-state actors. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.11.005

Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 33-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009874203400

Alesina, A., & Weder, B. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review, 92(4), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344669

Ali, M., Khan, L., Sohail, A., et al. (2019). The relationship between foreign aid and corruption: a case of selected Asian countries. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(3), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-08-2018-0089

Anselin, L., Gallo, J. Le, & Jayet, H. (2008). Spatial Panel Econometrics. In: Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75892-1_19

Anselin, L., Le Gallo, J., & Jayet, H. (2006). Spatial panel econometrics. In: Matyas, L., Sevestre, P. (editors). The econometrics of panel data, fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice, 3rd ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 901-969.

Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Floreani, J. (2022). Corruption, foreign aid, and international trade. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22253

Bauhr, M., Charron, N., & Nasiritousi, N. (2013). Does Corruption Cause Aid Fatigue? Public Opinion and the Aid-Corruption Paradox1. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12025

Belotti, F., Hughes, G., & Mortari, A. P. (2017). Spatial Panel-data Models Using Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 17(1), 139–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1701700109

Berthélemy, J. (2006). Bilateral Donors’ Interest vs. Recipients’ Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics, 10(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00311.x

Chakrabarti, A., & Ghosh, J. K. (2011). AIC, BIC and Recent Advances in Model Selection. Philosophy of Statistics, 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51862-0.50018-6

Charron, N. (2011). Exploring the Impact of Foreign Aid on Corruption: Has The “Anti-Corruption Movement” Been Effective? The Developing Economies, 49(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2010.00122.x

Corruption Eradication Commission. (2023). Corruption Crime Statistics. Available online: https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan (accessed on 21 May 2024).

Dang, C. T., & Le, C. Q. (2022). Spatio-Temporal Dependence of Corruption in Vietnam. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 15(4), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-022-09447-1

Dávid-Barrett, E., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced? World Development, 132, 105000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105000

Dávid-Barrett, E., Fazekas, M., Hellmann, O., et al. (2020). Controlling Corruption in Development Aid: New Evidence from Contract-Level Data. Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(4), 481–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-020-09315-4

de la Croix, D., & Delavallade, C. (2013). Why corrupt governments may receive more foreign aid. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpt004

Devarajan, S. (2009). Aid and Corruption. Available online: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/africacan/aid-and-corruption (accessed on 21 May 2024).

Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., & Thiele, R. (2011). Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries. World Development, 39(11), 1950–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.024

Drukker, D. M., Peng, H., Prucha, I. R., et al. (2013). Creating and Managing Spatial-Weighting Matrices with the Spmat Command. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 13(2), 242–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1301300202

Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial Panel Models. In: Handbook of Regional Science. Springer.

Ferry, L. L., Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Schneider, C. J. (2020). Catch me if you care: International development organizations and national corruption. The Review of International Organizations, 15(4), 767–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09371-z

Heidenheimer, A. J. (1989). What is the Problem about Corruption? In: Johnson, M., & LeVine, V. T. (editors). Political Corruption: A Handbook. Transaction.

Hoeffler, A., & Outram, V. (2011). Need, Merit, or Self‐Interest—What Determines the Allocation of Aid? Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00605.x

Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2018). Corruption Prosecution Trends 2018. Available online: https://antikorupsi.org/en/article/trends-corruption-prosecution-2018 (accessed on 29 May 2024).

Isaksson, A. S., & Kotsadam, A. (2018). Chinese aid and local corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 159, 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.01.002

Jensen, P. S., & Schmidt, T. D. (2011). Testing for Cross-sectional Dependence in Regional Panel Data. Spatial Economic Analysis, 6(4), 423–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2011.610813

Kangoye, T. (2013). Does Aid Unpredictability Weaken Governance? Evidence from Developing Countries. The Developing Economies, 51(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12008

Kemp, M. C., & Long, N. V. (2009). Foreign Aid in the Presence of Corruption: Differential Games among Donors. Review of International Economics, 17(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00820.x

Knack, S. (2001). Aid Dependence and the Quality of Governance: Cross-Country Empirical Tests. Southern Economic Journal, 68(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061596

Knack, S. (2013). Aid and donor trust in recipient country systems. Journal of Development Economics, 101, 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.12.002

Lee, H., & Ghosh, S. K. (2009). Performance of information criteria for spatial models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 79(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949650701611143

Maqbool, S., & Ali, M. (2021). The relationship between foreign aid and income inequality and the role of corruption. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2687

Menard, A. R., & Weill, L. (2016). Understanding the link between aid and corruption: A causality analysis. Economic Systems, 40(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.01.001

Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2012). The effect of foreign aid on corruption: A quantile regression approach. Economics Letters, 115(2), 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.051

Palagashvili, L., & Williamson, C. R. (2021). Grading foreign aid agencies: Best practices across traditional and emerging donors. Review of Development Economics, 25(2), 654–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12747

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504

Sayanak, T., & Lahiri, S. (2009). Foreign Aid as Prize: Incentives for a Pro‐Poor Policy. Review of Development Economics, 13(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00498.x

Svensson, J. (2000a). Foreign aid and rent-seeking. Journal of International Economics. 51(2), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00014-8

Svensson, J. (2000b). When is foreign aid policy credible? Aid dependence and conditionality. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00061-9

Tavares, J. (2003). Does foreign aid corrupt? Economics Letters, 79(1), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00293-8

Transparency International. (2024). What Is Corruption? Available online: https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption (accessed on 29 May 2024).

Transparency International. (2023). About Transparency International? Available online: https://www.transparency.org/en/what-is-corruption (accessed on 29 May 2024).

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. USA: MIT Press.

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue