The impact of smart elderly care service acceptance on elderly service usage behavior in Xi’an: An analysis of mediating effects based on the UTAUT model and the moderating role of digital literacy

Bo Yang ,John Walsh

doi:10.24294/jipd8238

Home - JIPD - Volume 8 - Issue 13

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

The impact of smart elderly care service acceptance on elderly service usage behavior in Xi’an: An analysis of mediating effects based on the UTAUT model and the moderating role of digital literacy

Bo Yang

John Walsh

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2024, 8(13), 8238; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd8238

Submitted：28 Jul 2024

Accepted：21 Aug 2024

Published：13 Nov 2024

Download PDF(443.38KB)

XML

Abstract

As the aging trend intensifies, the Chinese government prioritizes technological innovation in smart elderly care services to enhance quality and efficiency, catering to the diverse needs of the elderly. This study examines the acceptance and usage behavior of smart elderly care services among elderly individuals in Xi’an, using a modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model that includes digital literacy as a moderating variable. Data were collected via a survey of 299 elderly individuals aged 60 and above in Xi’an. The study aims to identify factors influencing the acceptance and usage behavior of smart elderly care services and to understand how digital literacy moderates the relationship between these factors and usage behavior. Regression analysis assessed the direct effects of Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC) on usage behavior. These dimensions were then integrated into a comprehensive index Service Acceptance to evaluate their overall impact on usage behavior, with behavioral intention examined as a potential mediating variable. Results indicate that EE and SI significantly impact the adoption of smart elderly care services, whereas PE and FC do not. Behavioral intention mediates the relationship between these variables and usage behavior. Additionally, gender, age, and digital literacy significantly moderate the impact of service acceptance on usage behavior. This study provides valuable theoretical and practical insights for designing and promoting smart elderly care services, emphasizing the importance of usability and social promotion to enhance the quality of life for the elderly.

Keywords

References

Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Digital competence for 21st Century. In: Mapping Digital Competence: Towards a Conceptual Understanding. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 45–53

Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122

Bai, M., Liu, S., You, J., An, N. (2024). A study on the influencing factors of users’ continuous usage behavior of smart elderly care platforms based on grounded theory (Chinese). Journal of Medical Informatics, (03), 16–23.,16–23. doi: CNKI: SUN: YXQB.0.2024–03–016.

Bland, M., Altman, D.G., Altaian, D.G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314, 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572

Braun, M.T. (2013). Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav., 29, 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.004

Buckingham, D. (2003). Part I: Rationales. In: Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 3–49.

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y. (2017). The Competence. In: DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 21–43.

Chen, Y., Shao, W. (2021). Smart elderly care: Connotations, dilemmas, and suggestions (Chinese). Jianghuai Forum, (02),139–145+193. https://doi.org/10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2021.02.019.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q., 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deursen, A.V., Dijk, J.A. (2010). Measuring Internet Skills. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 891–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2010.496338

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 93–106.

Ferrari, A. (2013). The Digital Competence Framework. In: DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp. 15–36.

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy in the Modern World. In: Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–24.

Heart, T., Kalderon, E. (2013). Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? International journal of medical informatics, 82 11, e209–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.002

Holden, R.J., Karsh, B. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of biomedical informatics, 43 (1), 159–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002

Hoque, M.R., Sorwar, G. (2017). Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. International journal of medical informatics, 101, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002

Hunsaker, A., Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20, 3937–3954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818787348

Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. (1989). A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15, 373–388.

Jolliffe, I.T., Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

Kang, H., Han, J., Kwon, G.H. (2022). The Acceptance Behavior of Smart Home Health Care Services in South Korea: An Integrated Model of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013279

Laguna, K.D., Babcock, R.L. (1997). Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747–5632(97)00012–5

Levine, D.M., Lipsitz, S.R., Linder, J.A. (2016). Trends in Seniors’ Use of Digital Health Technology in the United States, 2011-2014. JAMA, 316 5, 538–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9124

Li, M., Wang, Z., Wang, L. (2017). Factors influencing the use of elderly care technology by elderly people living at home: A survey in Beijing, Nanjing, and Xianyang (Chinese). Population and Development, (03),84–92. https://doi:CNKI:SUN:SCRK.0.2017–03–009.

Li, X., Chen, Z., Xia, X. (2022). The impact of digital literacy on farmers’ entrepreneurial behavior: An analysis based on the spatial Dubin model (Chinese). Journal of Central South University of Economics and Law, (01),123–134. https://doi.org/10.19639/j.cnki.issn1003–5230.2022.0006.

Lian, J. (2015). Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 35, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.005

Liu, J., Zuo, M., Liu, M. (2012). An empirical analysis of elderly internet users’ continued use based on expectation confirmation theory (Chinese). Management Review, (05),89–101. https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11–5057/f.2012.05.003.

Lou, S., Liu, H. (2023). Awareness, use, and need of smart care for older adults: A comparative study based on a survey in Macao, China. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1135164

Mao, Y., Li, D. (2015). A study on the factors influencing smart elderly care users’ behavior based on the UTAUT model: A case study of Wuhan’s “One–Click” service (Chinese). E-Government, (11),99–106. https://doi.org/10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2015.11.001.

Meng, Q., Hong, Z., Li, Z. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges for Chinese Elderly Care Industry in Smart Environment Based on Occupants’ Needs and Preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01029

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ., 59, 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.04.016

Norman, C.D., Skinner, H.A. (2006). eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.8.2.E9

Peek, S.T., Wouters, E.J., Hoof, J.V. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International journal of medical informatics, 83 4, 235–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004

Rose, N., Wagner, W., Mayer, A., Nagengast, B. (2019). Model-Based Manifest and Latent Composite Scores in Structural Equation Models. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1525/COLLABRA.143

Sui, D., Peng, Q. (2016). “Internet + Home-based elderly care”: A smart home-based elderly care service model (Chinese). Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (05),128–135. https://doi.org/10.14100/j.cnki.65–1039/g4.2016.05.016.

Sun, H., Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013

Tipping, M.E., Bishop, C.M. (1999). Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9868.00196

Venkatesh, V., Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decis. Sci., 39, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540–5915.2008.00192.X

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G. (2000). Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Institutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Behavioral Marketing eJournal. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, G. S., Van, D. B. G. (2016). DigComp 2.0—the Conceptual Reference Model. In: DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: the Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. pp. 8–9

Wang, H., Gao, W., Hu, Y. (2018). The current status and implications of new media literacy among elderly people in the context of smart elderly care (Chinese). Journal of Nursing Science, (08),97–100. https://doi: CNKI:SUN:HLXZ.0.2018–08–037.

Wang, X., Lee, C., Jiang, J. (2023). Research on the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Smart Aged-Care Products by the Aged in China: Extension Based on UTAUT Model. Behavioral Sciences, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030277

Xie, Q., Yue, T. (2019). The necessity and pathways of digital integration for elderly people in the context of active aging (Chinese). Contemporary Continuing Education, (04),10–16. https://doi:CNKI:SUN:HDAJ.0.2019–04–002.

Yang, Q., Feng, Y. (2020). A study on the willingness to use smart elderly care products based on the UTAUT model (Chinese). Aging Science Research, (01),18–31. doi:CNKI:SUN:LLKX.0.2020–01–004.

Yao, X., Su, Q., Zhu, M. (2021). Research on the willingness to adopt smart elderly care services and its influencing factors (Chinese). Hubei Social Sciences, (08), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.13660/j.cnki.42-1112/c.015682.

Yu, X., Fu, D. (2004). A review of multi-index comprehensive evaluation methods (Chinese). Statistics and Decision, (11),119–121. doi:CNKI:SUN:TJJC.0.2004–11–065.

Yu, X., Sun, Y. (2017). “Internet + Elderly care”: Research on innovative development of elderly care service models in the new era. Population Journal (Chinese), (01), 58–66. https://doi.org/ 10.16405/j.cnki.1004–129X.2017.01.006.

Zhang, Y., Lian, N. (2018). Research on the demand and willingness of elderly people for smart elderly care services in care institutions: A survey based in Baotou City (Chinese). Economic Research Guide, (27),55–59. https://doi:CNKI:SUN:JJYD.0.2018–27–024.

Zhang, Z., Mao, Y., Hu, Y. (2023). Research on the willingness to use smart elderly care services from the perspective of the elderly digital divide (Chinese). Northwest Population, (01),104–115. https://doi.org/10.15884/j.cnki.issn.1007–0672.2023.01.008.

Zhou, G. (2019). The Smart Elderly Care Service in China in the Age of Big Data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1302. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742–6596/1302/4/042008

Zuo, M. (2014). Connotations, models, and opportunities of smart elderly care (Chinese). China Public Security, (10),48–50. doi:CNKI:SUN:GGAZ.0.2014–10–004.

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue