Influencing factors and paths of public support for carbon emission reduction policies—An integration model

Jialu Yu

doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i9.7563

Home - JIPD - Volume 8 - Issue 9

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

Influencing factors and paths of public support for carbon emission reduction policies—An integration model

Jialu Yu

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2024, 8(9), 7563; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.7563

Submitted：28 Jun 2024

Accepted：28 Jun 2024

Published：10 Sept 2024

Download PDF(700.99KB)

Cite

XML

Abstract

Research has shown that understanding the fundamental of public support for carbon emission reduction policies may undermine policy formulation and implementation, yet the direction of influence and the transmission mechanism remain unclear. Using data from using data from 1482 questionnaires conducted in Hangzhou, China, this paper has examined a comprehensive model of the factors and paths influencing public support for carbon emission reduction policies, and evaluated the determinants and predictors of policy support regarding individual psychological perceptions, social-contextual perceptions, and perceptions of policy features. The results show that the variables in both the individual psychological perception and social contextual perception dimensions have no significant effect on carbon tax, however, be important constructure in carbon trading; in the policy characteristics perception dimension, both variables have a significant positive effect on both carbon tax and carbon trading, and are also the strongest predictors of policy support for carbon policies. Further evidence suggests that future policies could be more acceptable to residents by strengthening their environmental values, social norms can further arouse residents’ social responsibility to care about climate, and whether the policy is effective or fair to help residents realize the importance of the policy as well as the need for their participation and willingness to dedicate themselves to the mitigation of climate change.

Keywords

References

Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Bandura, A. (2002). Environmental sustainability by sociocognitive deceleration of population growth. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Bandura, A. (2004). Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.

Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., & Schultz, W. P. (2019). A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101941.

Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Woerdman, E., et al. (2017). Understanding Effectiveness Skepticism. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36(2), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118

Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., & Hamilton, C. (2016). Why experience changes attitudes to congestion pricing: The case of Gothenburg. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.002

Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M. B., et al. (2012). The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transport Policy, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.001

Börjesson, M., Hamilton, C. J., Näsman, P., et al. (2015). Factors driving public support for road congestion reduction policies: Congestion charging, free public transport and more roads in Stockholm, Helsinki and Lyon. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.008

Botrel, C. A., Rekker, S., Wade, B., et al. (2024). Understanding the lobbying actions taken by the Australian renewable energy industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139674

Chung, J. Y., Kyle, G. T., Petrick, J. F., et al. (2011). Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest. Tourism Management, 32(5), 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.016

Cialdini, R. B., & Jacobson, R. P. (2021). Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.005

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

Clayton, S. (1998). Preference for Macrojustice Versus Microjustice in Environmental Decisions. Environment and Behavior, 30(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598302003

Clayton, S. (2000). New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Models of Justice in the Environmental Debate. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00178

Crowley, K., Jayawardena, O. (2017). Energy disadvantage in Australia: policy obstacles and opportunities. Energy Procedia, 121, 284-291.

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408

Douenne, T., Fabre, A. (2020). French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169, 106496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.029

Eid, R., Agag, G., & Shehawy, Y. M. (2020). Understanding Guests’ Intention to Visit Green Hotels. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(3), 494–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020947800

Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017

Folger, R. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice: Multifaceted meanings and interrelations. Social Justice Research, 9(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02196992

Geels, F. W. (2013). The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.11.004

Grazzini, L., Rodrigo, P., Aiello, G., et al. (2018). Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(11), 1944–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1526294

Gross, J., & Vostroknutov, A. (2022). Why do people follow social norms? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.016

Han, H., Hwang, J., & Lee, M. J. (2016). The value-belief-emotion-norm model: investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1208790

Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2017). Drivers of pro-environmental tourist behaviours are not universal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.087

Kals, E., Russell, Y. (2001). Individual conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining proenvironmental decision making. Soc. Justice Res., 14 (4), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014698528132

Kiatkawsin, K., & Han, H. (2017). Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tourism Management, 59, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.018

Kim, J., Schmöcker, J. D., Fujii, S., et al. (2013). Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.005

Kornilaki, M., Thomas, R., & Font, X. (2019). The sustainability behaviour of small firms in tourism: the role of self-efficacy and contextual constraints. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1561706

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

Ling, M., & Xu, L. (2021). How and when financial incentives crowd out pro-environmental motivation: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101715

Ling, M., Xu, L., & Yang, H. (2023). The crowding out effect of financial incentives on conformity to pro-environmental social norms: a quasi-experiment on household recycling. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(13), 3359–3376. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2223758

Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., et al. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.241

MacCoun, R. J. (2005). Voice, control, and belonging: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958

Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19(9), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490

Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., Savin, I., et al. (2021). Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27380-8

Majeed, S., & Kim, W. G. (2022). A reflection of greenwashing practices in the hospitality industry: a scoping review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(3), 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2022-0495

Makki, A. M., Ozturk, A. B., & Singh, D. (2016). Role of risk, self-efficacy, and innovativeness on behavioral intentions for mobile payment systems in the restaurant industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19(5), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2016.1188646

Nyborg, K. (2018). Reciprocal climate negotiators. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.008

Rasinski, K. A., Smith, T. W., & Zuckerbraun, S. (1994). Fairness Motivations and Tradeoffs Underlying Public Support for Government Environmental Spending in Nine Nations. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02426.x

Reese, G., & Jacob, L. (2015). Principles of environmental justice and pro-environmental action: A two-step process model of moral anger and responsibility to act. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.011

Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz, L. (editor). Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 10, 221-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical testes in 20 countries. In: Zanna, M. (editor). Advances in experimental social psychology. Orland, FL: Academic Press, 25, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., et al. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.

Thøgersen, J. (2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004

Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (2015). Beyond Formal Procedures: The Interpersonal Context of Procedural Justice. Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728377-4

van Buuren, S. (2018). Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, Second Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492259

van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018

Xu, L., Zhang, X., & Ling, M. (2018). Pro-environmental spillover under environmental appeals and monetary incentives: Evidence from an intervention study on household waste separation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 60, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.003

Yan, H., & Chai, H. (2021). Consumers’ Intentions towards Green Hotels in China: An Empirical Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Model. Sustainability, 13(4), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042165

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue