On-demand transportation in promoting sustainable urban mobility: A systematic literature review and survey analysis

László Buics ,Alex Suta ,Márk Szalay

doi:10.24294/jipd10010

Home - JIPD - Volume 9 - Issue 2

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

On-demand transportation in promoting sustainable urban mobility: A systematic literature review and survey analysis

László Buics

Alex Suta

Márk Szalay

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2025, 9(2); https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10010

Submitted：31 Oct 2024

Accepted：26 Dec 2024

Published：21 Mar 2025

Download PDF(444.83KB)

XML

Abstract

The concept of sustainable urban mobility has gained increasing attention in recent years due to the challenges posed by rapid urbanization and environmental degradation. The objective of this study is to explore the role of on-demand transportation in promoting sustainable urban mobility, incorporating insights from customer interests and demands through survey analysis. To fulfill this objective, a mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a systematic literature review with survey analysis of customer interests and demands regarding on-demand transportation services. This study combines a systematic literature review and a targeted survey to provide a comprehensive analysis of sustainable urban mobility, addressing gaps in understanding customer preferences alongside technological and financial considerations. The literature review encompassed various aspects including technological advancements, regulatory frameworks, user preferences, and environmental impacts. The survey analysis involved collecting data on customer preferences, satisfaction levels, and suggestions for improving on-demand transportation services. The findings of the study revealed significant insights into customer interests and demands regarding on-demand transportation services. Analysis of survey data indicated that factors such as convenience, affordability, reliability, and environmental sustainability were key considerations for customers when choosing on-demand transportation options. Additionally, the survey identified specific areas for improvement, including service coverage, accessibility, and integration with existing transportation networks. By providing flexible, efficient, and environmentally friendly transportation options, on-demand services have the potential to reduce congestions, improve air quality, and enhance overall urban livability.

Keywords

References

Bokolo, A. J. (2020, June). Applying enterprise architecture for digital transformation of electro mobility towards sustainable transportation. In Proceedings of the 2020 on Computers and People Research Conference (pp. 38–46).

Bokolo, A. J. (2021). Exploring data driven initiatives for smart city development: empirical evidence from techno-stakeholders’ perspective. Urban Research & Practice, 15(4), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1869816

Bokolo, A. J. (2023a). Data driven approaches for smart city planning and design: a case scenario on urban data management. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(4), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-03-2022-0023

Bokolo, A. J. (2023b). Data enabling digital ecosystem for sustainable shared electric mobility-as-a-service in smart cities-an innovative business model perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 51, 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101043

Briner, R. B., and Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management (pp. 112–129). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007

Denyer, D., and Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a Systematic Review. In D. Buchanan and A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications Ltd.

future research perspectives. Long range planning, 49(1), 36–54.

García, J. R. R., Lenz, G., Haveman, S. P., and Bonnema, G. M. (2019). State of the Art of Mobility as a Service (MAAS) Ecosystems and Architectures—An overview of, and a definition, Ecosystem and System architecture for Electric Mobility as a Service (EMAAS). World Electric Vehicle Journal, 11(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj11010007

Georgakis, P., Almohammad, A., Bothos, E., Magoutas, B., Arnaoutaki, K., and Mentzas, G. (2020). Heuristic-Based Journey Planner for Mobility as a Service (MAAS). Sustainability, 12(23), 10140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310140

Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., and Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041

Khanji, S., and Assaf, S. (2019, June). Boosting ridesharing efficiency through blockchain: Greenride application case study. In 2019 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS) (pp. 224–229). IEEE.

Münzel, K., Boon, W., Frenken, K., Blomme, J., and Van Der Linden, D. (2019). Explaining carsharing supply across Western European cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1542756

Orecchini, F., and Santiangeli, A. (2011). Beyond smart grids – The need of intelligent energy networks for a higher global efficiency through energy vectors integration. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(13), 8126–8133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.01.160

Perätalo, S., Ahokangas, P., and Iivari, M. (2023). Smart city business model approach: the role of opportunities, values, and advantages. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2286439

Rahman, M. A., Rashid, M., Hossain, M. S., Hassanain, E., Alhamid, M. F., and Guizani, M. (2019). Blockchain and IoT-Based Cognitive Edge framework for sharing economy services in a smart City. IEEE Access, 7, 18611–18621. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2896065

Reynen, E., Robson, R., Ivory, J., Hwee, J., Straus, S. E., Pham, B., and Tricco, A. C. (2018). A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 96, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.001

Sun, J., Xiao, L., Tian, J., Zhou, H., and Roveda, J. (2016). Surrogating circuit design solutions with robustness metrics. Integration, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.2015.07.015

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., and Smart, P. (2003). Study on and instrument to assess knowledge supply chain systems using advanced kaizen activity in SMEs. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2014.11517339

Wirtz, B. W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., and Göttel, V. (2016). Business Models: origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.04.001

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue