AI sustainability in the art sector: Chinese contemporary visual artists’ solutions for working with AI to overcome global AI concerns

Emma Duester

doi:10.24294/jipd11263

Home - JIPD - Volume 9 - Issue 2

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

AI sustainability in the art sector: Chinese contemporary visual artists’ solutions for working with AI to overcome global AI concerns

Emma Duester

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2025, 9(2), 11263; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd11263

Submitted：03 Jan 2025

Accepted：24 Feb 2025

Published：08 Apr 2025

Download PDF(449.57KB)

XML

Abstract

Nationwide integration of AI into the contemporary art sector has taken place since government AI regulations in 2023 to promote AI use. China’s AI integration into industry is ‘ahead’ of other countries, meaning that other countries can learn from these creative professionals. Consequently, contemporary visual artists have devised arts-led sustainable AI solutions to overcome global AI concerns. They are now putting these solutions into practice to maintain their jobs, arts forms, and industry. This paper draws on 30 interviews with contemporary visual artists, and a survey with 118 professional artists from across China between 2023 and 2024. Findings show that 87% use AI and 76% say AI is useful and they will continue to use AI into the future. Findings show professionals have had time to find DIY, bottom-up solutions to AI concerns, including (1) building strong authorship practices, identity, and brand, (2) showing human creativity and inner thinking, (3) gaining a balanced independent position with AI. They want AI regulations to liberalise and promote AI use so they can freely experiment and develop AI. These findings show how humans are directing the use of AI, altering current narratives on AI-led impacts on industry, jobs, and human creativity.

Keywords

Quality and efficiency

References

Abd Manaf, Z., & Ismail, A. (2010). Malaysian cultural heritage at risk? Library Review, 59(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531011023862

Andrews, H., & Hawcroft, A. (2024). Articulating arts-led AI: artists and technological development in cultural policy. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2024.12820

Appel, G., Neelbauer, J., Schweidel, D. A. (2023). Generative AI has an intellectual property problem. Available online: https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem (accessed on 12 November 2024).

Attard-Frost, B. (2023). Generative AI Systems: Impacts on Artists & Creators and Related Gaps in the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4468637

Bajpai, N., & Biberman, J. (2021). Digital Transformation and the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8-YBCZ-3D35

Barker, T., & Yuen Beng, L. (2017). Making Creative Industries Policy: The Malaysian Case. Kajian Malaysia, 35(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.2.2

Cant, J. (2024). AI is coming: Future-Proofing your Digital Art career. Available online: https://www.christophercant.com/blog/ai-is-coming-future-proofing-your-digital-art-career#:~:text=People%20who%20value%20human-made,wasn’t%20made%20by%20AI (accessed on 15 October 2024).

Chatterjee, A. (2022). Art in an age of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024449

Contreras-Koterbay, S. (2019). The Teleological Nature of Digital Aesthetics—the New Aesthetic in Advance of Artificial Intelligence. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, 20, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i20.326

Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). (2023). DCMS and digital economic estimates: business demographics. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/dcms-and-digital-economic-estimates-business-demographics-2023 (accessed on 6 November 2024).

Dzhimova, M., & Tigre Moura, F. (2024). Calculated Randomness, Control and Creation: Artistic Agency in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Arts, 13(5), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13050152

European Commission. (2019). Report on Cultural Heritage: Digitisation, Online Accessibility and Digital Preservation. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-commission-report-cultural-heritage-digitisation-online-accessibility-and-digital (accessed on 1 November 2024).

European Parliament. (2020). The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/634452/EPRS_STU(2020)634452_EN.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2024).

Falcke, L., Zobel, A.-K., Yoo, Y., et al. (2024). Digital Sustainability Strategies: Digitally Enabled and Digital-First Innovation for Net Zero. Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0169

Francastel, P. (2000). Art and Technology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, 1st ed. New York: Zone. pp. 70-99.

Geiger, C., & Iaia, V. (2024). The forgotten creator: Towards a statutory remuneration right for machine learning of generative AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105925

Horton, C.B., White, M.W. and Iyengar, S.S., (2023). Will AI Art Devalue Human Creativity?. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2987022/v1

Husain, A. (2017). The sentient machine: The coming age of artificial intelligence. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Hylland, O. M. (2017). Even Better than the Real Thing? Digital Copies and Digital Museums in a Digital Cultural Policy. Culture Unbound, 9(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.179162

International Institute for Sustainable Development (2022) Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/mission-and-goals/sustainable-development

International Labour Organisation (ILO). (2023). Social Security Policy Monitor China. Available online: https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/ShowRessource.action;jsessionid=93LdmFDhuJE1Wqe7z_38UpmYTizxV9iRaEaF0DGelwST1jmiJyiW!1945465934?id=58300 (accessed on 10 November 2024).

Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K.-M., et al. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944

Kalpokas, I. (2023). Work of art in the Age of Its AI Reproduction. Philosophy & Social Criticism. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231184490

Kammara, C. T. (2022). In a world where AI generates art, are human artists still relevant? Available online: https://charanwrites.medium.com/in-a-world-where-ai-generates-art-are-human-artists-still-relevant-2d12a7a64c9c (accessed on 6 November 2024).

Katsamakas, E. (2022). Digital Transformation and Sustainable Business Models. Sustainability, 14(11), 6414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116414

Katsamakas, E. (2024). From Digital to AI Transformation for Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(8), 3293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083293

Lalu, D. (2023). Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://media.inti.asia/read/digital-transformation-for-sustainable-development-navigating-the-intersection-of-technology-and-sustainability#:~:text=Digital%20transformation%20presents%20both%20opportunities,%2C%20social%2C%20and%20environmental%20factors (accessed on 8 October 2024).

Lavelle, S. (2020). The machine with a human face: from artificial intelligence to artificial sentience. In: Proceedings of Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops: CaiSE 2020 International Workshops; 8–10 June 2020; Grenoble, France. pp. 63-75.

Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Cooper, V., et al. (2021). Digital Transformation: Environmental Friend or Foe? Panel Discussion at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2019. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48(1), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.04846

Mahdawi, A. (2017). What jobs will still be around in 20 years? Read this to prepare your future. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/26/jobs-future-automation-robots-skills-creative-health (accessed on 29 November 2024).

Mangset, P., Kangas, A., Skot‐Hansen, D., et al. (2008). Nordic cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701856435

Mokre, M. (2011). GovernCreativity, or, creative industries Austrian style of Creativity. Available online: https://eipcp.net/policies/cci/mokre/en/print.html (accessed on 12 November 2024).

Network of European Museum Organisations (NEMO). (2022). Guide: Digital Transformation in Cultural Heritage. Available online: https://www.ne-mo.org/news-events/article/guide-digital-transformation-in-cultural-heritage (accessed on 10 November 2024).

OECD. (2018). OECD AI Principles overview. Available online: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles (accessed on 29 September 2024).

Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004

Pan, S. L., Carter, L., Tim, Y., et al. (2022). Digital sustainability, climate change, and information systems solutions: Opportunities for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102444

Papagiannidis, S., & Marikyan, D. (2022). Environmental sustainability: A technology acceptance perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102445

Papagiannis, H. (2017). Augmented Human: How Technology Is Shaping the New Reality, 1st ed. Sebastopol, California, USA: O’Reilly Media. pp. 1-58.

Philbin, S., Viswanathan, R., & Telukdarie, A. (2022). How digital transformation can enable SMEs to achieve sustainable development: A systematic review (Spanish). Small Business International Review, 6(1), e473. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v6i1.473

Rieland, R. (2014). 7 Ways Technology Is Changing How Art Is Made. Available online: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/7-ways-technology-is-changing-how-art-is-made-180952472/?no-ist (accessed on 14 November 2024).

Robinson, H. (2018). Cultural policy, local government and museums: an Australian perspective. Local Government Studies, 44(5), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1488688

Samuelson, P. (2023). Generative AI meets copyright. Science, 381(6654), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656

Shanken, E. A. (2002). Art in the Information Age: Technology and Conceptual Art. Leonardo, 35(4), 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409402760181259

Tajalli, P. (2021). AI ethics and the banality of evil. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09587-x

Tang, S., Chen, L., He, K., et al. (2023). Computational Intelligence and Deep Learning for Next-Generation Edge-Enabled Industrial IoT. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 10(5), 2881–2893. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnse.2022.3180632

Togiya, N. (2013). Trends in digital cultural heritage in Japan, 1980-2012. Art Libraries Journal, 38(2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0307472200017971

UK Parliament. (2024). Artificial intelligence and new technology in creative industries. Available online: https://post.parliament.uk/artificial-intelligence-and-new-technology-in-creative-industries/ (accessed on 6 November 2024).

UNESCO. (2021). Towards sustainable preservation and accessibility of documentary heritage. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380171 (accessed on 1 November 2024).

UNESCO. (2023). Empowering creativity: implementing the UNESCO 1980 Recommendation Concerning the Status of the Artist; 5th global consultation. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387452.locale=en (accessed on 10 November 2024).

United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oslo, Norway: United Nations General Assembly, Development and International Co-operation: Environment.

Wade, M. (2024) Is AI a Threat to Human Creativity? available at https://www.oxford-aiethics.ox.ac.uk/ai-threat-human-creativity

World Economic Forum. (2022). Scaling AI: Here’s why you should first invest in responsible AI. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/11/artificial-intelligence-invest-responsible-ai/ (accessed on 20 November 2024).

Yusa, I. M. M., Yu, Y., & Sovhyra, T. (2022). Reflections on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Works of Art. Journal of Aesthetics, Design, and Art Management, 2(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.58982/jadam.v2i2.334

Zeilinger, M. (2021). Tactical Entanglements: AI Art, Creative Agency, and the Limits of Intellectual Property, 1st ed. Milton Keynes, UK: Meson Press. pp. 105-205.

Zhou, E., & Lee, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence, human creativity, and art. PNAS Nexus, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae052

Zhou, Y., Sun, J., & Huang, Y. (2019). The Digital Preservation of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China: A Survey. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 48(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2019-0004

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue