The advocate planner in regional splits: Social network analysis approach

Diki Suherman ,Ridwan Sutriadi ,Adenantera Dwicaksono ,Tommy Firman

doi:10.24294/jipd7713

Home - JIPD - Volume 9 - Issue 2

Submit to JIPD

Journal Browser

Volume | Year

Issue

• Current lssue

View All

News and Announcements

View All

The advocate planner in regional splits: Social network analysis approach

Diki Suherman

Ridwan Sutriadi

Adenantera Dwicaksono

Tommy Firman

Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development 2025, 9(2), 7713; https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd7713

Submitted：01 Jul 2024

Accepted：05 Feb 2025

Published：17 Feb 2025

Download PDF(560.04KB)

XML

Abstract

The discourse on advocacy planning involving actors has not explicitly addressed the question of who the actor advocate planner is and how an actor can become an advocate planner. This paper attempts to exploring the actor advocate planner in the context of Regional Splits as, employing social network analysis as a research tool. This research employs an exploratory, mixed-methods approach, predominantly qualitative in nature. The initial phase entailed the investigation and examination of qualitative data through the acquisition of information from interviews with key stakeholders involved in Regional Splits, including communities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), governmental entities, and political parties. The subsequent phase utilized quantitative techniques derived from the findings of the qualitative analysis, which were then analysis into the Gephi application. The findings indicate that the Regional Splits the Presidium Community represents civil society and political parties serve as crucial advocate planners, facilitating connections between disparate actors and promoting Regional Splits through political parties.

Keywords

References

Ao, Z., Cong, L. W., Horvath, G., Zhang, L. (2023). Is decentralized finance actually decentralized? A Social Network Analysis of the Aave Protocol on the Ethereum Blockchain. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2206.08401 (accessed on 26 June 2024).

Aspinal, E., Fealy, G. (2003). Local power and politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation & democratisation. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Bakti, I., Zubair, F., Budiana, H. R. (2023). Participatory communication as the key to successful disaster management in Pangandaran district. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 11(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v11i2.49785

Bobrovnyk, D. O. (2024). Formation of the Globalist Potential of the Territorial Community in the Context of the Establishment and Development of International Cooperation of Local Government Bodies. Alfred Nobel University Journal of Law, 1(8), 13–30.

Booth, A. (2011). Splitting, splitting and splitting again: A brief history of the development of regional government in Indonesia since independence. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land-En Volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 167(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003601

BPS-Statistics of Pangandaran Regency. (2022). Title. Available online: https://pangandarankab.bps.go.id/publication/download.html?nrbvfeve=ZTQ0NmFiNzE1NWFjNWY2N2JlNDAxODFi&xzmn=aHR0cHM6Ly9wYW5nYW5kYXJhbmthYi5icHMuZ28uaWQvcHVibGljYXRpb24vMjAyMi8wMi8yNS9lNDQ2YWI3MTU1YWM1ZjY3YmU0MDE4MWIva2FidXBhdGVuLXBhbmdhbmRhcmFuLWRhbGFtLWFuZ (accessed on 26 June 2024).

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design (Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran), 4th ed. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., Creswell, J. D. (2018). Reasearch Design,Qualitative, uantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches (V). SAGE Publication.

Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.

Fleury, M.-J., Grenier, G., Vallée, C., et al. (2014). The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: The example of the planning phase of the at Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal. Evaluation and Program Planning, 45, 42–49.

Fouad, H., Rego, N. (2024). Can social network analysis contribute to supply chain management? A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26598

Grooms, W., Frimpong Boamah, E. (2018). Toward a political urban planning: Learning from growth machine and advocacy planning to “plannitize” urban politics. Planning Theory, 17(2), 213–233.

Halcomb, E., Hickman, L. (2015). Mixed methods research. Nursing Standard: promoting excellence in nursing care, 29(32), 41–47.

Istania, R. (2021). How do ethnic groups compete for a new province in a decentralised Indonesia? Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2021.1993944

Kimura, E. (2017). Political change and territoriality in Indonesia: Provincial proliferation. Routledge.

Krumholz, N. (1982). A retrospective view of equity planning Cleveland 1969–1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976535

Mutakaliman. (2014). Pangandaran as a New Regency in the Perspective of Al-Maşlaḥah Al-Murlah (Indonesian). Available online: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/12959/1/BAB I%2C IV%2C DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2024).

Perera, B. S. S., Dhananjani, G. G. S., Bandara, A. M. C. A., et al. (2024). DeMedia: Decentralization of Social Media. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 13th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT); 6–7 April 2024; Jabalpur, India. pp. 1082–1087.

Reardon, K. M. (2005). Empowerment planning in East St. Louis, Illinois: A peoples’ response to the deindustrialization blues. City, 9(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810500128629

Reaven, M. (2020). Neighborhood Activism in Planning for New York City, 1945–1975. Journal of Urban History, 46(6), 1261–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144217705446

Sager, T. (2022). Advocacy planning: Were expectations fulfilled? Planning Perspectives, 37(6), 1205–1230.

Satriawan, R. B. P. H., Ihsan, Y. N., Herawati, T., et al. (2024). Evaluation of distribution and management of marine debris on the Pangandaran Coast. Acta Aquatica: Aquatic Sciences Journal, 11(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.29103/aa.v11i1.13709

Scott, J. (2012). What is social network analysis? Bloomsbury Academic.

Scott, J., Tallia, A., Crosson, J. C., et al. (2005). Social network analysis as an analytic tool for interaction patterns in primary care practices. The Annals of Family Medicine, 3(5), 443–448.

Thabit, W. (1999). A History of PEO (Planners for Equal Opportunity). Available online: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/c25f3910-3ac1-4341-ae79-acaa24eddb41/content (accessed on 26 June 2024).

Van Klinken, G., Schulte Nordholt, HGC. (2007). Renegotiating boundaries: Local politics in post-Suharto Indonesia. Brill.

Varone, F., Ingold, K., Jourdain, C., Schneider, V. (2017). Studying policy advocacy through social network analysis. European Political Science, 16, 322–336.

Yan, Z., Peng, L., Feng, W., Yang, L. T. (2021). Social-chain: Decentralized trust evaluation based on blockchain in pervasive social networking. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 21(1), 1–28.

Previous
article in this issue

Next
article in this issue