[1] Zana Minz, Yi, former editor of Chernov, translator of Wang Weisheng. Selection of Russian formalism [M]. Zhengzhou University
Press, 2005:320-321.
[2] Hu Tao. “Literariness” study [D]. Central China Normal University, 2013.
[3] Zhang Jiaxiang. The spread and development of the concept of “literary nature” in the 40 years of reform and opening up [D]. Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2023.
[4] Victor Erlich,Russian Formalism:History-Doctrine,4th,Hague:Mouton Publishers, 1980,p.172.
[5] Hu Jingli, Zhang Premiere. The selection of western twentieth-century literary theory. Volume 2, Works System [M]. China SocialSciences Press, 1989:307-328.
[6] Yu Hong, Yang Hengda, Yang Huilin. question. NO.1[M]. Central Compilation and Translation Press, 2003:143
[7] Xu Zhiqiang. —— Take the “posttheory” of David Simpson and Jonathan Kallal as an example [J]. Learning and Exploration, 2013
(4): 4.
[8] Culler J D .The literary in theory[M].Stanford University Press,2006:5.
[9] Wang Yuechuan. Postmodern symptoms of “literary” resolution [J]. Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2004, (03): 11-19.
[10] Wu Zilin. On the “literary expansion” question [J]. Literary and artistic contention, 2005, (03): 75-79.
[11] Wei Zhang. From literariness to interliterature —— On aesthetic disenchantment and value reconstruction of literariness in the era
of consumption [J]. Social Sciences in Beijing, 2015, (02): 47-52.
[12] Zhang Kaiyan. Is literature really expanding wildly?—— Discuss with Professor Tao Dongfeng [J]. Literary contention, 2006, (03):
35-40.
[13] Shi Zhongyi. My view of the definition of “literary nature” [J]. Chinese Comparative Literature, 2000 (03): 124-130.
[14] Zhou Xiaoyi. literariness [J]. Foreign Literature, 2003 (05): 51-63.
