Nekolla EN, Schegerer AA, Griebel J, et al. Häufigkeit und Dosis diagnostischer und interventional Röntgenanwendungen: Trends between 2007 and 2014. Der Radiologe 2017; 57(7): 555–562. doi: 10.1007/s00117-017-0242-y.
Rauschenberg J, Nagel AM, Ladd SC, et al. Multicenter study of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7 and 9.4 T. Investigative Radiology 2016; 49: 249–259.
Schaap K, Christopher-De VY, Mason CK, et al. Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5–7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2014; 71: 423–429.
Friebe B, Wollrab A, Thormann M, et al. Sensory perceptions of individuals exposed to the static field of a 7 T MRI: A controlled blinded study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2015; 41: 1675–1681.
Van Nierop LE, Slottje P, Kingma H, et al. MRI-related static magnetic stray fields and postural body sway: A double-blind randomized crossover study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2013; 70: 232–240.
Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Eilers K, et al. Vestibular effects of a 7 Tesla MRI examination compared to 1.5 T and 0 T in healthy volunteers. PLOS ONE 2014; 9: e92104.
Antunes A, Glover PM, Li Y, et al. Magnetic field effects on the vestibular system: Calculation of the pressure on the cupula due to ionic current-induced Lorentz force. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2012; 57: 4477–4487.
Boegle R, Stephan T, Ertl M, et al. Magnetic vestibular stimulation modulates default mode network fluctuations. NeuroImage 2016; 127: 409–421.
Glover PM, Li Y, Antunes A, et al. A dynamic model of the eye nystagmus response to high magnetic fields. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2014; 59: 631–645.
Mian OS, Li Y, Antunes A, et al. On the vertigo due to static magnetic fields. PLOS ONE 2013; 8: e78748.
Mian OS, Li Y, Antunes A, et al. Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo. Journal of Physiology 2016; 594: 1051–1067.
De Vocht F, Glover P, Engels H, et al. Pooled analyses of effects on visual and visuomotor performance from exposure to magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners: Application of the Bayesian framework. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007; 26: 1255–1260.
Van Nierop LE, Slottje P, Van ZMJ, et al. Effects of magnetic stray fields from a 7 Tesla MRI scanner on neurocognition: A double-blind randomized crossover study. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2012; 69: 759–766.
Heinrich A, Szostek A, Meyer P, et al. Cognition and sensation in very high static magnetic fields: A randomized case-crossover study with different field strengths. Radiology 2013; 266: 236–245.
Gilles M, Paslakis G, Heinrich A, et al. A cross-over study of effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathoadrenergic system in magnetic field strength exposure from 0 to 7 Tesla. Stress 2013; 16: 172–180.
Brix G. Basics of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Risks and safety issues related to MR examinations. In: Reiser MF, Semmler W, Hricak H (editors). Magnetic Resonance Tomography. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 153–167.
Van Nierop LE, Slottje P, Van ZM, et al. Simultaneous exposure to MRI-related static and low-frequency movement-induced time-varying magnetic fields affects neurocognitive performance: A double-blind randomized crossover study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015; 74: 840–849.
Lepsien J, Muller K, Von Cramon DY, et al. Investigation of higher-order cognitive functions during exposure to a high static magnetic field. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012; 36: 835–840.
Schlamann M, Voigt MA, Maderwald S, et al. Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2010; 31: 1061–1066.
Atkinson IC, Sonstegaard R, Pliskin NH, et al. Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23-sodium and 17 oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2010; 32: 82–87.
Toyomaki A, Yamamoto T. Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007; 26: 1216–1221.
Assecondi S, Vanderperren K, Novitskiy N, et al. Effect of the static magnetic field of the MR-scanner on ERPs: Evaluation of visual, cognitive and motorpotentials. Clinical Neurophysiology 2010; 121: 672–685.
Gosselin MC, Neufeld E, Moser H, et al. Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: The Virtual Population 3.0. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2014; 59: 5287–5303.
Murbach M, Cabot E, Neufeld E, et al. Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology 2012; 107: 428–433.
Murbach M, Neufeld E, Kainz W, et al. Whole-body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5 T MR body coil. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2013; 71: 839–845.
Boss A, Graf H, Berger A, et al. Tissue warming and regulatory responses induced by radio frequency energy deposition on a whole-body 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imager. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2007; 26: 1334–1339.
Neufeld E, Gosselin MC, Murbach M, et al. Häufigkeit und Dosis diagnostischer und interventioneller Röntgenanwendungen: Trends zwischen 2007 und 2014 (German) [Frequency and dose of diagnostic and interventional X-ray applications: Trends between 2007 and 2014]. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2011; 56: 4649–4659.
Massire A, Cloos MA, Luong M, et al. Thermal simulations in the human head for high field MRI using parallel transmission. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2012; 35: 1312–1321.
Murbach M, Neufeld E, Cabot E, et al. Virtual population-based assessment of the impact of 3 Tesla radiofrequency shimming and thermoregulation on safety and B1 + uniformity. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016; 76: 986–997.
Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL, et al. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2006; 55: 883–893.
Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV. Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2010; 55: 913–930
Kikuchi S, Saito K, Takahashi M, et al. Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2010; 55: 2411–2426.
Murbach M, Neufeld E, Samaras T, et al. Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2016; 77(5): 2048–2056. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26268.
Cawley P, Few K, Greenwood R et al. Does magnetic resonance brain scanning at 3.0 tesla pose a hyperthermic challenge to term neonates? Journal of Pediatrics 2016; 175: 228–230.