1. Chinzei K, Hata N, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. Surgical assist robot for the active navigation in the intraoperative MRI, Hardware design issues. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000), Takamatsu, Japan, 2000; 1, 727–732.
2. Tsekos NV, Khanicheh A, Christoforou E, et al. Magnetic Resonance–Compatible Robotic and Mechatronics Systems for Image-Guided Interventions and Rehabilitation: A Review Study. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2007; 9(1): 351-387. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.121806.160642
3. Razek A. From Open, Laparoscopic, or Computerized Surgical Interventions to the Prospects of Image-Guided Involvement. Applied Science. 2025; 15, 4826.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094826
4. Razek A, Image-guided surgical and pharmacotherapeutic routines as part of diligent medical treatment. Applied Science. 2023; 13, 13039.
5. Marrelli D, Piccioni SA, Carbone L, et al. Posterior and Para-Aortic (D2plus) Lymphadenectomy after Neoadjuvant/Conversion Therapy for Locally Advanced/Oligometastatic Gastric Cancers. 2024; 16(7), 1376.
6. Faoro G, Maglio S, Pane S, et al. An Artificial Intelligence-Aided Robotic Platform for Ultrasound-Guided Transcarotid Revascularization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2023; 8(4): 2349-2356. doi: 10.1109/lra.2023.3251844
7. Balasubramanyam A, Manwani R, Kalyanpur D, Basavaraju PB, Padmaraju SV, Honnavalli PB. A cardiovascular modeling framework for enabling personalized healthcare: A Digital Twin Approach. In2025 IEEE 13th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) 2025 Jun 18 (pp. 478-489). IEEE.
8. Padhan J, Tsekos N, Al-Ansari A, et al. Dynamic Guidance Virtual Fixtures for Guiding Robotic Interventions, Intraoperative MRI-guided Transapical Cardiac Intervention Paradigm. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE (BIBE), Taichung, Taiwan, 2022; 265–270.
9. Singh S, Torrealdea F, Bandula S. MR Imaging‒Guided Intervention: Evaluation of MR Conditional Biopsy and Ablation Needle Tip Artifacts at 3T Using a Balanced Fast Field Echo Sequence. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2021; 32(7): 1068-1074.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.536
10. Xu L, Pacia CP, Gong Y, et al. Characterization of the Targeting Accuracy of a Neuronavigation-Guided Transcranial FUS System In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2023; 70(5): 1528-1538. doi: 10.1109/tbme.2022.3221887
11. Navarro-Becerra JA, Borden MA, Targeted Microbubbles for Drug, Gene, and Cell Delivery in Therapy and Immunotherapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(6), 1625.
12. Delaney LJ, Isguven S, Eisenbrey JR, et al. Making waves: how ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches. Materials Advances. 2022; 3(7): 3023-3040. doi: 10.1039/d1ma01197a
13. Razek A, Augmented therapeutic tutoring in diligent image-assisted robotic interventions. AIMS Medical Science 2024; 11(2), 210-219.
14. Bizzarri N, Pedone Anchora L, Teodorico E, et al. The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in locally advanced cervical cancer staging. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2024; 50(12), 108645.
15. Li SY, Ye‑Wang, Cheng-Xin, et al. Correction to: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with increased risk of postoperative peritoneal metastases in T4 colon cancer: a propensity score analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2025; 40(1). doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04810-3
16. Taghavi K, Glenisson M, Loiselet K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Extended application in children. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2024; 50(12), 108627.
17. Taylor RH, Menciassi A, Fichtinger G, Fiorini P, Dario P. Medical Robotics and Computer-Integrated Surgery. Springer Handbook of Robotics B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, Eds. in Springer Handbooks, Cham: Springer International Publishing 2016; 1657–1684.
18. Wan Q, Shi Y, Xiao X, et al. Review of Human–Robot Collaboration in Robotic Surgery. Advanced Intelligent Systems. 2024; 7(2). doi: 10.1002/aisy.202400319
19. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2011; 128(1), 305-310.
20. Zhang B, Liu L, Meng D, et al. Medical imaging technology: Principles and systems. INNOSC Theranostics and Pharmacological Sciences. 2024; 7(3): 3360. doi: 10.36922/itps.3360
21. Kraus MS, Coblentz AC, Deshpande VS, et al. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging sequences for pediatric body imaging. Pediatric Radiology. 2022; 53(7): 1285-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05528-y
22. Haskell MW, Nielsen JF, Noll DC. Off-resonance artifact correction for MRI: A review. NMR in Biomedicine. 2023; 36, e4867.
23. Su H, Kwok KW, Cleary K, et al. State of the art and future opportunities in MRI-guided robot-assisted surgery and interventions. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2022; 110, 968-992.
24. Bernardes MC, Moreira P, Lezcano D, et al. In Vivo Feasibility Study: Evaluating Autonomous Data-Driven Robotic Needle Trajectory Correction in MRI-Guided Transperineal Procedures. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2024; 9(10), 8975–8982.
25. Mohith S, Upadhya AR, Navin KP, Kulkarni SM, Rao M. Recent trends in piezoelectric actuators for precision motion and their applications: A review. Smart Materials and Structures. 2020; 30, 013002.
26. Wang S, Zhou S, Zhang X,et al. Bionic stepping motors driven by piezoelectric materials. Journal of Bionic Engineering. 2023;20:858-872.
27. Zhang S, Liu Y, Deng J, et al. Piezo robotic hand for motion manipulation from micro to macro. Nature Communication. 2023; 14, 500.
28. Tao F, Sui F, Liu A, et al. Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research. 2019; 57, 3935-3953.
29. Grieves M, Vickers J. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. Trans-disciplinary Perspectives on Complex Syst. Cham, Switzerland: Springer 2017; 85-113.
30. Sun T, He X, Li Z. Digital twin in healthcare: Recent updates and challenges. Digit Health 2023; 9, 20552076221149651.
31. Al-Jaroodi J, Mohamed N. Enhancing the Efficiency of Healthcare Facilities Management with Digital Twins. International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets), Harrisonburg, VA, USA, 2024; 1-5.
32. Ricci A, Croatti A, Montagna S. Pervasive and connected digital twins-a vision for digital health. IEEE Internet Computing. 2022; 26, 26-32.
33. Wickramasinghe N, Ulapane N, Sloane EB, Gehlot V. Digital Twins for More Precise and Personalized Treatment. In: MEDINFO 2023—The Future Is Accessible. IOS Press; 2024; 310, 229-233.
34. Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, Barlow C. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access. 2020; 8, 108952-108971. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.
35. Maxwell JC. VIII. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society. 1865; 155, 459–512.
36. Henrotte F, Geuzaine C. Electromagnetic forces and their finite element computation. International Journal of Numerical Modelling. 2024; 37(5), e3290.
37. Gürbüz IT, Martin F, Rasilo P, Billah MM, Belahcen A. A new methodology for incorporating the cutting deterioration of electrical sheets into electromagnetic finite-element simulation. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2024; 593, 171843...
38. Urdaneta-Calzadilla A. Chadebec O. Galopin N. et al. Modeling of Magnetoelectric Effects in Composite Structures by FEM–BEM Coupling. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2023; 59(5), 1-4, 7000604.
39. Antunes O.J. Bastos J.P.A. Sadowski N. et al. Using hierarchic interpolation with mortar element method for electrical machines analysis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2005; 41, 1472–1475.
40. Gu B, Li H, Li B. An internal ballistic model of electromagnetic railgun based on PFN coupled with multi-physical field and experimental validation, Defence Technology. 2024; 32, 254-261.
41. Kudela J, Matousek R. Recent advances and applications of surrogate models for finite element method computations: A review. Soft computing. 2022; 26, 13709-13733.
42. Cheng M, Zhao X, Dhimish M, Qiu W, Niu S. A Review of Data-driven Surrogate Models for Design Optimization of Electric Motors. IEEE Trans. on Transportation Electrification. 2024; 10(4), 8413-84311.
43. Hasgall, PA, Di Gennaro F, Baumgartner C, et al. iT’S Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues 2022. Version 4.1.
https://doi.org/10.13099/vip21000-04-1 » IT'IS Foundation
44. Makarov SN, Noetscher GM, Yanamadala J, et al. Virtual Human Models for Electromagnetic Studies and Their Applications. Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2017; 10, 95–121.
45. Harris L.R. Zhadobov M. Chahat N. Sauleau R. Electromagnetic dosimetry for adult and child models within a car: Multi-exposure scenarios. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies. 2011; 3, 707–715.
46. Cellina M. Cè M. Alì M. et al. Digital Twins: The New Frontier for Personalized Medicine? Applied Science. 2023; 13, 7940.
47. Kangasmaa O, Laakso I, Schmid G. Estimating Human Fat and Muscle Conductivity From 100 Hz to 1 MHz Using Measurements and Modelling. Bioelectromagnetics. 2025; 46, e22541.
49. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Vlg, 1993.
50. Song Y. Human digital twin, the development and impact on design. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering. 2023; 23, 060819.
51. Katsoulakis E, Wang Q, Wu H, et al. Digital twins for health: a scoping review. npj Digital Medicine. 2024; 7, 77.
52. Armeni P, Polat I, De Rossi LM, Diaferia L, Meregalli S, Gatti A. Digital twins in healthcare: is it the beginning of a new era of evidence-based medicine? A critical review. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022; 12, 1255.
53. You C. Lu H. Zhao J. Qin B. Liu W. The Comparison Between Traditional Versus 3D Printing Combined with Computer Navigation Technique in the Management of Orbital Blowout Fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2025; 36, 201–205.
54. Bates H.W. Contributions to an insect fauna of the amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London. 1862; 23, 495–566.
55. Razek A. Matching of an observed event and its virtual model in relation to smart theories, coupled models and supervision of complex procedures—A review. Comptes Rendus Physique. 2024; 25, 141–156.
56. Razek A. Strategies for managing models regarding environmental confidence and complexity involved in intelligent control of energy systems—A review. Advances in Environment and Energies. 2023; 2, aee020104.
57. Kou M, Dong X, Liu H, Zhou Q, Lin Q An adaptive multi-fidelity surrogate-based robust optimization approach considering the combined effect of various uncertainties Engineering with Computers10.1007/s00366-025-02236-742:2Online publication date: 26-Feb-2026
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s00366-025-02236-7
58. Choubey S, Rahi S, Pal B, Agrawal M A novel data generation scheme for surrogate modelling with deep operator networks Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112086161:PA Online publication date: 1-Dec-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112086.
59. Lebensztajn L. Marretto C.A.R. Caldora Costa M. Coulomb J.L. Kriging: A useful tool for electromagnetic device optimization. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2004; 40, 1196–1199.
60. Gaignaire R. Scorretti R. Sabariego R.V. Geuzaine C. Stochastic uncertainty quantification of eddy currents in the human body by polynomial chaos decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2012; 48, 451–454.
61. Den Boer J.A. Bourland J.D. Nyenhuis J.A. Ham C.L. Engels J.M. Hebrank F.X. Frese G. Schaefer D.J. Comparison of the threshold for peripheral nerve stimulation during gradient switching in whole body MR systems. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2002; 15, 520–525.
62. Davids M. Guerin B. Klein V. Wald L.L. Optimization of MRI Gradient Coils with Explicit Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Constraints. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2021; 40, 129–142.
63. Thylur D.S. Jacobs R.E. Go J.L. Toga A.W. Niparko J.K. Ultra-High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Human Inner Ear at 11.7 Tesla. Otology & Neurotology. 2017; 38, 133–138.
64. Crozier S. Liu F. Numerical evaluation of the fields induced by body motion in or near high-field MRI scanners. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 2005; 87, 267–278.
65. van Osch M.J.P. Webb A.G. Safety of Ultra-High Field MRI: What are the Specific Risks? Current Radiology Reports. 2014; 2, 61.
66. Bouisset N. Laakso I. Induced electric fields in MRI settings and electric vestibular stimulations: Same vestibular effects? Experimental Brain Research. 2024; 242, 2493–2507.
67. Mian O.S. Li Y. Antunes A. Glover P.M. Day B.L. On the Vertigo Due to Static Magnetic Fields. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8, e78748.
68. Boegle R. Dieterich M. Kirsch V. Comment on: Modulatory Effects of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Resting-State Networks Can be Explained by Subject-Specific Orientation of Inner Ear Anatomy in the MR Static Magnetic Field. Journal of Experimental Neurology. 2020; 1, 109–114.
69. Li G. Patel N.A. Melzer A. Sharma K. Iordachita I. Cleary K. MRI-guided lumbar spinal injections with body-mounted robotic system: Cadaver studies. Minim. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 2022; 31, 297–305.
70. Yu N. Gassert R. Riener R. Mutual interferences and design principles for mechatronic devices in magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2011; 6, 473–488.
71. Zhou X. Wu S. Wang X. Wang Z. Zhu Q. Sun J. Huang P. Wang X. Huang W. Lu Q. Review on piezoelectric actuators: Materials, classifications, applications, and recent trends. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering. 2024; 19, 6.
72. Okegbile S. D. Cai J. Zheng H, Chen J. Yi C. Differentially Private Federated Multi-Task Learning Framework for Enhancing Human-to-Virtual Connectivity in Human Digital Twin. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 2023; 41(11), 3533-3547.
73. Yang Y. et al. Dynamic Human Digital Twin Deployment at the Edge for Task Execution: A Two-Timescale Accuracy-Aware Online Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. 2024; 23(12), 12262-12279.
74. Chen J. Yi C. Okegbile S. D. Cai J. Shen X. Networking Architecture and Key Supporting Technologies for Human Digital Twin in Personalized Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2024; 26(1), 706-746.
75. Chen J. Shi Y. Yi C. Du H. Kang J. Niyato D. Generative-AI-Driven Human Digital Twin in IoT Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2024; 11 (21), 34749-34773.
76. Razek, A.; Pichon, L. Smart Digital Environments for Monitoring Precision Medical Interventions and Wearable Observation and Assistance. Technologies. 2026; 14, 40.
77. Razek, A. Image-Guided Autonomous Robotic Surgery in the Context of Therapies Managed by Intelligent Digital Technologies: A Narrative Review. Surgeries. 2026; 7, 26.
78. Razek, A.; Bernard, Y. Potential of Piezoelectric Actuation and Sensing in High Reliability Precision Mechanisms and Their Applications in Medical Therapeutics. Actuators. 2025; 14, 528.
