Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2013; 44: 593–622. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135914.
Crowther TW, Glick HB, Covey KR, et al. Map-ping tree density at a global scale. Nature 2015; 525: 201–205. doi: 10.1038/nature14967.
Parrotta JA, Wildburger C, Mansourian S. Under-standing relationships between biodiversity, car-bon, forests and people: The key to achieving REDD+ objectives. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO); 2012. p. 161.
Scharlemann JP, Tanner EV, Hiederer R, Kapos V. Global soil carbon: Understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Man-age 2014; 5(1): 81–91. doi: 10.4155/cmt.13.77.
Wei X, Shao M, Gale W, Li L. Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Scientific Reports 2014; 4: 4062. doi: 10.1038/srep04062.
Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, et al. Plan-tation forests and biodiversity: Oxymoron or op-portunity? Biodiversity and Conservation 2008; 17: 925–951. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x.
Nave LE, Swanston CW, Mishra U, Nadelhoffer KJ. Afforestation effects on soil carbon storage in the United States: A synthesis. Scientific Journal 2013; 77(3): 1035–1047. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2012.0236.
Tedersoo L, Sepping J, Morgunov AS, et al. To-wards a co-crediting system for carbon and bio-diversity. Plants, People, Planet 2023. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10405.
Huuskonen S, Domisch T, Finér L, et al. What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem ser-vices in boreal forests in Fennoscandia? Forest Ecology and Management 2021; 479: 118558. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558.
Wang X, Hua F, Wang L, et al. The biodiversity benefit of native forests and mixed‐species plan-tations over monoculture plantations. Diversity and Distributions 2019; 25(11): 1721–1735. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12972.
Yang X, Bauhus J, Both S, et al. Establishment success in a forest biodiversity and ecosystem functioning experiment in subtropical China (BEF-China). European Journal of Forest Re-search 2013; 132: 593–606. doi: 10.1007/s10342-013-0696-z.
Dı́az S, Cabido M. Vive la différence: Plant func-tional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2001; 16(11): 646–655. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2.
Anacker BL, Klironomos JN, Maherali H, et al. Phylogenetic conservatism in plant‐soil feedback and its implications for plant abundance. Ecology Letters 2014; 17(12): 1613–1621. doi: 10.1111/ele.12378.
Gougherty AV, Davies TJ. Towards a phylogenet-ic ecology of plant pests and pathogens. Philo-sophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2021; 376: 20200359. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0359.
Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N. Be-yond species: Functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 2011; 48(5): 1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x.
Ampoorter E, Barbaro L, Jactel H, et al. Tree di-versity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest‐associated taxa in Europe. Oikos 2020; 129(2): 133–146. doi: 10.1111/oik.06290.
Martin FM, Uroz S, Barker DG. Ancestral allianc-es: Plant mutualistic symbioses with fungi and bacteria. Science 2017; 356(6340): eaad4501. doi: 10.1126/science.aad4501.
Bahram M, Netherway T, Hildebrand F, et al. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies drive topsoil microbiome structure and function. New Phytolo-gist 2020; 227(4): 1189–1199. doi: 10.1111/nph.16598.
Read DJ. Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experientia 1991; 47: 376–391. doi: 10.1007/BF01972080.
Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Midgley MG. The mycor-rhizal-associated nutrient economy: A new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient cou-plings in temperate forests. New Phytologist 2013; 199(1): 41–51. doi: 10.1111/nph.12221.
Tedersoo L, Bahram M. Mycorrhizal types differ in ecophysiology and alter plant nutrition and soil processes. Biological Reviews 2019; 94: 1857–1880. doi: 10.1111/brv.12538.
Grossman JJ, Vanhellemont M, Barsoum N, et al. Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments. En-vironmental and Experimental Botany 2018; 152: 68–89. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.12.015.
Morales-Rodríguez C, Anslan S, Auger-Rozenberg MA, et al. Forewarned is forearmed: Harmonized approaches for early detection of potentially invasive pests and pathogens in senti-nel plantings. NeoBiota 2019; 47: 95–123. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.47.34276.
Li XC, Qian X, Gao C, et al. Plant identity strong-ly structures the root-associated fungal communi-ty in a diverse subtropical forest. Basic and Ap-plied Ecology 2021; 55: 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2021.01.002.
Tedersoo L, Mikryukov V, Anslan S, et al. The global soil mycobiome consortium dataset for boosting fungal diversity research. Fungal Diversi-ty 2021; 111: 573–588. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00493-7.
Zanne AE, Tank DC, Cornwell WK, et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 2014; 506: 89–92. doi: 10.1038/nature12872.
Orme D. The caper package: Comparative analy-sis of phylogenetics and evolution in R [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 20]. Available from: https://cran.irsn.fr/web/packages/caper/vignettes/caper.pdf.
Griffin EA, Harrison JG, McCormick MK, et al. Tree diversity reduces fungal endophyte richness and diversity in a large-scale temperate forest ex-periment. Diversity 2019; 11(12): 234. doi: 10.3390/d11120234.
Bruelheide H, Nadrowski K, Assmann T, et al. Designing forest biodiversity experiments: Gen-eral considerations. illustrated by a new large ex-periment in subtropical China. Methods in Ecolo-gy and Evolution 2014; 5(1): 74–98. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12126.
Teste FP, Kardol P, Turner BL, et al. Plant-soil feedback and the maintenance of diversity in Mediterranean-climate shrublands. Science 2017; 355(6321): 173–176. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8291.
Tedersoo L, Brundrett MC. Evolution of ectomy-corrhizal symbiosis in plants. In: Tedersoo L (edi-tor). Ecological studies. Cham: Springer Cham; 2017. p. 407–467. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56363-3_19.
Koele N, Dickie IA, Oleksyn J, et al. No globally consistent effect of ectomycorrhizal status on fo-liar traits. New Phytologist 2012; 196(3): 845–852. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04297.x.
Van de Peer T, Mereu S, Verheyen K, et al. Tree seedling vitality improves with functional diversi-ty in a Mediterranean common garden experi-ment. Forest Ecology and Management 2018; 409: 614–633. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.001.
Ferlian O, Cesarz S, Craven D, et al. Mycorrhiza in tree diversity-ecosystem function relationships: Conceptual framework and experimental imple-mentation. Ecosphere 2018; 9(5): e02226. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2226.
Heklau H, Schindler N, Buscot F, et al. Mixing tree species associated with arbuscular or ecto-trophic mycorrhizae reveals dual mycorrhization and interactive effects on the fungal partners. Ecology Evolution 2021; 11(10): 5424–5440. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7437.
Singavarapu B, Beugnon R, Bruelheide H, et al. Tree mycorrhizal type and tree diversity shape the forest soil microbiota. Environmental Micro-biology 2022; 24(9): 4236–4255. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15690.
Ferlian O, Lintzel EM, Bruelheide H, et al. Nutri-ent status not secondary metabolites drives her-bivory and pathogen infestation across different-ly mycorrhizal tree monocultures and mixtures. Basic and Applied Ecology 2021; 55: 110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2020.09.009.
Weissbecker C, Heintz-Buschart A, Bruelheide H, et al. Linking soil fungal generality to tree richness in young subtropical Chinese forests. Microorgan-isms 2019; 7(11): 547. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7110547.
Vehviläinen H, Koricheva J. Moose and vole browsing patterns in experimentally assembled pure and mixed forest stands. Ecography 2006; 29(4): 497–506. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04457.x.
Verheyen K, Vanhellemont M, Auge H, et al. Contributions of a global network of tree diversity experiments to sustainable forest plantations. Ambio 2016; 45: 29–41. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1.
